Your submission was sent successfully! Close

You have successfully unsubscribed! Close

Thank you for signing up for our newsletter!
In these regular emails you will find the latest updates about Ubuntu and upcoming events where you can meet our team.Close

CVE-2023-4807

Published: 8 September 2023

Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue. As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap: OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000 The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue.

Notes

AuthorNote
sbeattie
windows builds only

Priority

Medium

Cvss 3 Severity Score

7.8

Score breakdown

Status

Package Release Status
edk2
Launchpad, Ubuntu, Debian
bionic Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
focal Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
jammy Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
lunar Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
mantic Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
trusty Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
upstream Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
xenial Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
nodejs
Launchpad, Ubuntu, Debian
bionic Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
focal Not vulnerable
(uses system openssl)
jammy Needed

lunar Not vulnerable
(uses system openssl)
mantic Not vulnerable
(uses system openssl)
trusty Not vulnerable
(uses system openssl)
upstream Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
xenial Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
openssl
Launchpad, Ubuntu, Debian
bionic Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
focal Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
jammy Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
lunar Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
mantic Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
trusty Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
upstream Not vulnerable
(debian: Windows-specific)
xenial Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
openssl1.0
Launchpad, Ubuntu, Debian
bionic Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
focal Does not exist

jammy Does not exist

lunar Does not exist

mantic Does not exist

trusty Does not exist

upstream Not vulnerable
(windows platform only)
xenial Does not exist

Severity score breakdown

Parameter Value
Base score 7.8
Attack vector Local
Attack complexity Low
Privileges required Low
User interaction None
Scope Unchanged
Confidentiality High
Integrity impact High
Availability impact High
Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H